Background: Oculomotor symptoms are frequent in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) and significantly contribute to the burden of disease in affected patients. Nevertheless, reporting of performance-dependent occurrence of double vision can often not directly be reproduced during short-term clinical examination. Here, we applied a novel AI-supported tool (PRET™)
3 to objectively assess a quantitative neuroophthalmological status in patients with severe generalized MG and to demonstrate feasibility of PRET™ in neurological conditions affecting the oculomotor system.
Methods: Patients with different neurological conditions and healthy controls are currently recruited for a prospective pilot study using PRET™, a novel virtual reality (VR-) headset-based oculography tool (ethics approval no. 23-7934-BR, 15-Nov-2023, ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of Ruhr-University Bochum). Within this framework, patients with severe generalized MG have been examined clinically and using PRET™ and scored (activities of daily living MG-ADL, quality of life MG-QoL). PRET™ runs an automated programme examining gaze holding and eye movements including horizontal and vertical saccades and horizontal smooth pursuit as well as ocular alignment, fusional amplitudes, visual fields and pupillary function (the latter not evaluated, here) within less than 12 minutes. We qualitatively summarize the data of the first three patients.
Results: We present the baseline data of three MG patients prior to their first infusion of an ongoing efgartigimod treatment, all of whom reporting end-of-dose symptom worsening before reinfusion (Pat. 1: male, 63 years; Pat. 2: male, 43 years; Pat. 3: female, 21 years). All patients reported double vision of varying degrees. They fully underwent PRET™ examination without patient-sided interruption or abortion due to discomfort or motion sickness.
As compared to three healthy participants with only few, patients 1 and 2 showed several saccadic intrusions during gaze holding, yet still being able to fixate with only minor intereye horizontal gaze position difference (below 2°). Patient 3 complaining constant double vision was not able to binocularly fixate in all positions except for right-up gaze (intereye horizontal gaze position difference ranging from 5 to 10° except for right-up gaze with 0-3°).
During smooth horizontal pursuit, performed approximately 7 minutes after start of the examination, the intereye difference is higher as compared to the initial phase of the examination in all three patients hampering binocular fixation. This phenomenon of exhaustion is not seen in either of the healthy participants.
Conclusions: The automated neuroophthalmological examination was feasible in all three patients and informed objectively about performance-dependent worsening of MG-associated oculomotor symptoms during the 12-minute examination. It clearly outperformed sole clinical examination and may serve as a novel outcome tool if further confirmed during our ongoing study.